Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Bullet Voting

    Philosophy
    2
    2
    178
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jack Waugh last edited by

      Is my intuition correct, that strategic bullet voting never helps in a LLull or Condorcet system with a good tie-breaking procedure?

      Approval-ordered Llull (letter grades) [10], Score // Llull [9], Score, STAR, Approval, other rated Condorcet [8]; equal-ranked Condorcet [4]; strictly-ranked Condorcet [3]; everything else [0].

      Marylander 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Marylander
        Marylander @Jack Waugh last edited by Marylander

        @jack-waugh Most good Condorcet systems tend not to satisfy later-no-harm, so there might be cases where it helps to bullet vote, although there also might be ways to specify a complete ranking that are also effective.

        That said, I do not think it is much better to encourage voters to express later preferences that are purely strategic in comparison to having them be strategically left blank.

        Score Sorted Margins[100]; STAR[90]; Score[81]; Approval[59]; IRV[18]; FPTP[0]

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post