Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Do real voters have more than three categories for candidates?

    Political Theory
    3
    4
    178
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jack Waugh last edited by

      Do real voters have more than three categories for candidates?

      Approval-ordered Llull (letter grades) [10], Score // Llull [9], Score, STAR, Approval, other rated Condorcet [8]; equal-ranked Condorcet [4]; strictly-ranked Condorcet [3]; everything else [0].

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @Jack Waugh last edited by

        @jack-waugh I certainly do

        rob 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • rob
          rob Banned @Guest last edited by

          @andy-dienes said in Do real voters have more than three categories for candidates?:

          @jack-waugh I certainly do

          I think I do, but need clarification on what is meant here. Do you mean more than 3 ranks/ratings? Like if voting under 0-100 cardinal ballots, would I want to use more than 3 different values for candidates in an 8 person race? Yes, generally, but depends on how closely I knew the candidates and how much I cared. (I vote in local elections with ranked choice, and often don't bother ranking ones that I don't know well enough to have a real opinion on them)

          Or are you talking about something else? Republican vs democrat vs other? Or what?

          In general, though, I am not a black and white thinker, so I do view things as lying on a spectrum rather than having discrete categories with hard lines. I think choose-one voting encourages the opposite way of thinking (i.e. discrete categories), where they are either on your team or not, and I think that is destructive.

          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @rob last edited by

            @rob

            but need clarification on what is meant here.

            yeah fair enough. I think the way I'm interpreting it, if you gave me 40 candidates and asked me to rank them, I would be able to easily sort into 5 or 6 piles, and then have to think harder for the actual order inside each pile.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • First post
              Last post