@gregw definitely. I think the main persuasive route is in framing the argument. I tried to present the most persuasive argument I could think of for the principle. There might be more persuasive arguments, and there might be persuasive arguments to the contrary that should be considered.

Still, if the principle is accepted, then the technical details required to actually implement it should be acceptable as long as they’re presented well—that gets difficult, because it really is a technical problem whose solution is not immediately obvious to people outside relevant fields (math, computer science, cryptography, economics, etc.).