@gregw I think this is sensible, I would fully support it if it could be shown to stand up to formal legal scrutiny, in the sense of constitutionality. I’m not a constitutional scholar by any means, it would be advantageous to have this kind of language drafted by a competent team of constitutional lawyers if possible (if it wasn’t already). My concern is the same as before, that if it’s not very carefully approached, it could lead to rulings that become very prohibitive to reform efforts. The less possibility of any kind of constitutional challenge, the (very much) better.