Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Close-Match Approval Cutoff

    Single-winner
    2
    2
    220
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      cfrank last edited by cfrank

      This is a concept that just occurred to me now so let me know if it reduces simply to something else, or if there’s an obvious flaw. But the idea is as follows:

      1. Let voters score candidates independently on some arbitrary scale.
      2. Determine the score cutoff for approval that minimizes the approval difference between the top two candidates, subject to the constraint that the difference be nonzero if possible.
      3. Elect the top approved candidate under that cutoff choice.

      If voters min-max, this reduces to approval voting. Otherwise it takes some account of differential ratings. There are obviously other ways to take account of them, maybe somebody will have a different idea. One could also minimize the relative approval difference.

      score-stratified-condorcet [10] cardinal-condorcet [9] ranked-condorcet [8] score [7] approval [6] ranked-bucklin [5] star [4] ranked-irv [3] ranked-borda [2] for-against [1] distribute [0] choose-one [0]

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        Jack Waugh last edited by Jack Waugh

        I can't see a proof that it is additive. I can't see a proof that it is Frohnmayer balanced. If a system isn't both of those things, I don't know how to convince myself that it accords equal influence to the voters regardless of how many or few candidates the voters oppose. And without equality, I fear that the monied interests can find a strategy within the system to confine the voters to a Prisoner's Dilemma and thereby prevent them from having any effective power over governmental policy.

        Approval-ordered Llull (letter grades) [10], Score // Llull [9], Score, STAR, Approval, other rated Condorcet [8]; equal-ranked Condorcet [4]; strictly-ranked Condorcet [3]; everything else [0].

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post