Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Absolute Smith // Score

    Single-winner
    1
    1
    107
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      Lime last edited by

      Method:

      1. Eliminate all candidates outside the pairwise-absolute majority Smith set. (i.e. equal-rating candidates creates cycles between the two candidates), unless this would eliminate all candidates.
      2. (Optional.) Allow voters to specify second-round preferences for each candidate within the same party.
      3. Elect the score winner.

      Behaves much like STAR, in that voters have less incentive to equal-rank several candidates (they want to make sure their favorite can beat the others). However, it maintains Favorite Betrayal.

      Reason: Originally, I expected STAR's gimmick runoff not to have much of an effect on score's good behavior. But ever since @SaraWolk mentioned the possibility of candidates not having clones in the race, I keep finding more and more situations where STAR reacts catastrophically badly to party-coordinated strategy. This is really bad, because parties exist for the explicit purpose of coordinating strategy. I'll give more examples elsewhere.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • First post
        Last post