Thanks for your offer Andy.
I became engrossed in learning to write and in presenting my arguments in digestible chunks. The result has been publishing three articles and a book.
Now I am trying to get them know about.
I approached seven editors, who helped with language but were frankly innumerate.
I am fine with writing the math, but it seems to me it may have been a mistake to remove Euclid from the school curriculum!
Hello!
I have been analyzing data and jurisprudence for Canadian electoral reform for over eight years now. My applicable backgrounds are in mathematics, data analysis, and computer programming, since 1970.
This approach has led to an essay on Constitutional Electoral Reform, which I would like members of the forum to critique for logical errors.
I don't particularly care if anyone likes SMDPR and I am not interested in delving into the minutia of anyone's favourite alternative electoral system.
What matters to me is the Canadian Constitution as it applies to elections, the logic of my objective measures of democracy and local representation, and fact-based common sense. But if there are logical or factual errors in my work I would like to know.
This appears to be the appropriate place to post such an essay, so I will seek to post it in draft form.