Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. BTernaryTau
    3. Topics
    B
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 6
    • Posts 19
    • Best 6
    • Groups 0

    Topics created by BTernaryTau

    • B

      My work and the definition of the Equality Criterion
      Research • • BTernaryTau

      5
      2
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      368
      Views

      B

      @SaraWolk @Jameson-Quinn Thank you for responding. I've emailed Sara about next steps, and I hope to hear back from you soon.

    • B

      Precinct-summability through seat capping
      Multi-winner • • BTernaryTau

      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      174
      Views

      No one has replied

    • B

      Does participation imply monotonicity?
      Voting Theoretic Criteria • • BTernaryTau

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      417
      Views

      ?

      You are def not the first one to ask this: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s003550100128.pdf Here they give a few examples that participation does not imply monotonicity.

    • B

      New Thiele-type proportional voting method
      New Voting Methods and Variations • • BTernaryTau

      11
      0
      Votes
      11
      Posts
      654
      Views

      K

      @bternarytau Pretty sure it was that the average was not theoretically motivated

    • B

      Handling non-deterministic tie-breaking in voting criteria
      Voting Methods • • BTernaryTau

      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      732
      Views

      Marylander

      @bternarytau

      This is a little nitpicky, but the notation

      P(f(k, e) = c)

      implies that k is random (because if k is fixed, then this probability would have to be either 0 or 1), but this is not stated.

      Assuming that there are finite possible seeds and that each seed is equally likely to be chosen, we could write:
      P(f(k, e) = c) = sum over s in S (I_c(f(s, e)))/|S|,
      where S is the set of seeds, I_c(f(s, e)) = 1 if f(s, e) = c and I_c(f(s, e)) = 0 otherwise.

      For many methods, |S| might need to be chosen in a way that depends on some limited information about the election, in particular the number of candidates (since for there to be an even 3-way tiebreaker, |S| needs to be divisible by 3 and so on). Methods that are "routinely" non-deterministic (such as random ballot) might also require the number of votes to select |S|.

    • B

      Hello!
      Introduce yourself • • BTernaryTau

      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      190
      Views

      No one has replied