Opportunity to either significantly improve this forum, or just let it go peacefully into the night

rob

With Jack giving up control [edit] what should happen next?

[edit] I’ll run it, or someone else can, or I’ll do it with someone else. It was originally planned that I’d run it prior to Equalvote miscounting the votes (for the name of the forum and domain) in their favor, then pulling a “let’s not accept the election results we don’t like,” and when I made a fuss it annoyed some people so I stepped away.

Jack’s worked hard on it, and we should be grateful, but I don’t think he has had much of a vision for how to grow the forum and I don't think he will claim to have one. (and he did unfortunately drive some people away by going off on tangents that many of us felt were toxic, and especially inappropriate for the person running it)

[edit]

I think it could be run well, have an inviting design, have it found by Google, be well moderated, and could be enhanced to have all kinds of voting widgets and other stuff that reddit's EndFPTP and the election methods mailing list can’t have due to not using forum software where such things are possible. If we do it well, we could attract a lot of interesting conversation and development, and bring in a lot of people from those other forums and elsewhere. I would certainly build out the "let's hold regular votes for favorite voting method" to make that be an integral part of the forum's identity.

Or we could let it continue to slowly die.

Thoughts?

@Andy-Dienes @Marylander @cfrank @Toby-Pereira @multi_system_fan @masiarek @BetterVoting

multi_system_fan

@rob yeah, it used to be much more interesting and I would favor any ideas to make it better! My understanding of stuff is not good enough to take an other role then posting every now and then...

Toby Pereira

@rob Well I'd be happy for you to run it if you think you can do good things with it. I definitely think this is a better forum for discussion anyway than the Election Methods mailing list (which is very 90s), although persuading all of those users over here might be difficult.

Jack Waugh

I think it would make sense for every participant to weigh in on Rob's proposal with support, opposition, or explicit abstention.

I abstain.

The domain registrar is currently in a waiting period where, if I understand correctly, I could block the transfer if I act fast enough. However, the mutiny has not appointed a treasurer yet, and has not obtained accounts for the services underlying the website, and I guess I would need to see those steps before I would start to obey.

There are other board members in the audience and I think I shared the credentials with them in the past.

As a point of history, for those who don't know: the board was formed by an interim board, which had assembled itself from volunteers on the predecessor forum, which CES used to maintain.

rob

@jack-waugh Agree people should come and weigh in definitively.

I'm not sure I'm comfortable calling it a mutiny. [edit]

As for things like treasurer, anyone is welcome to step up, but if I ran it and no one complained, I'd just cover the costs, at least for now. It's not that expensive to run a low traffic forum, and I can afford it. If it became popular, I might take a collection, possibly giving people badges or the like next to their names. I would make all costs public, even prior to taking any monetary contributions, and happily agree to never use contributions for anything but forum costs.

I personally think all the creating of an legal organization and council and other bureaucracy for a forum that only has a few posts a week is putting the cart before the horse. But if there are people who want that, then I welcome them to join up and do whatever work is needed. Likewise, if anyone wants to join me in running it, or even just take it over themselves, please do step up. So far I've heard crickets, but I'd be very happy to share the job (or give my support to someone who wants the job for themselves) if anyone is actually interested.

If I ran it, the major efforts I would be putting in, that isn't just basic maintenance, would be making sure it gets scraped by Google, bringing people in from other forums (such as via "vote for a voting method" and other things that aren't spammish), and building voting and election visualization widgets that can be embedded in posts. The latter is why I proposed the forum be self-hosted in the first place, because it would make such things possible.

There's one and only one rule I wouldn't budge on: if you don't participate in the forum, you don't get to decide its fate.

My post from 2020 where I proposed this forum (as a self hosted, NodeBB forum):
https://votingtheory.org/archive/posts?where={"_id"%3A5877}

Post following zoom meeting:
https://votingtheory.org/archive/posts?where={"topic_id"%3A720}

My contributions here:
https://www.votingtheory.org/forum/user/rob/posts

My portfolio, showing skills in design, UI, widget building, and general software engineering, all of which would eventually come into play if I ran the forum:
https://pianop.ly/portfolio-hidden-asdf/

I think @rob is very motivated to do nice things here and I support his efforts.

Jack Waugh

The domain-name registration is already in their control.

Suggested action of support for Rob's ideas:

[edited]
Open and fund an account at Linode or similar and start up a VM.

My public key for SSH:

ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQDyKXPJohLmFoMs1JjR3eJr91UOP1O6yCZD8cv9Zo2i/gl/GRwX9AG8eBrLQ+y8VRlv95NPB5sVIiEKupoCS9UVa62CxSDT1Gmi92sq+K0RpL+2wowaNQfNsg/n/dJj6+GbaxpJ1WSx1UOgPlkgCZhfj9+6Bl0+5KHD6jjU5aH51/uZBtFPGb2pu9hmc7XS+IhE9oiLQiYwAJ+Hi+AAHueNvM7CurtWE87PSwMQouxntbQhr5Kjspr/jIiFY4vY5V4rMwMgEmiJmezzV76PM4fVKkBjUjBJh9TAs92cLW83MyouxBuZL9B2RkIXIAlT9e9u2zWUSVEo2xjDm6wjfEWH jack@jack-acer

Jack Waugh

What are the IP# and username in the new VM so I can work on depositing the data there?

rob

@jack-waugh I'm confused. What VM? Who is that directed at?

I understand that at some point in the future, I'd need to set up a VM or whatever if I was to take control of running the forum. But I don't think we are there yet. Barely anyone has weighed in, although I think @Toby-Pereira and @Andy-Dienes were kind enough to say they wouldn't mind me running it.

Jack Waugh

I am not offering any opinion or advice about how many people should have to be supporting the project (verbally) before it launches, if at all. I'm suggesting that however that sociable process may go, if it leads to a VM being fired up and my being given access to a luser account thereon, I am willing to try to put the data over there. As a step toward this, I can just shift my current backup mechanism (if it is still working) to target the new VM instead of the one of mine that it now targets (actually, the mechanism may be using the "suck" technique, where the transfers are requested from the machine housing the backups). The other step is to include the pictures. The third is to make sure the archive from the old CES forum is included. Such a work contribution by me depends on my still being capable and available at the time in question. Other things in my life could pull me away. I hope that doesn't happen, but at this point, it is possible. I mentioned earlier something about the dump procedure for MongoDB, however, come to think of it, I must have already researched that for making the attempt I did make at starting a backup process. So no one should have to research that for me, as I should just be able to read it back from my scripts.

SaraWolk

Hi all,
The above post is unnecessarily alarmist and antagonistic. If people want to help make it better, then do so without attacking the people doing the work. The council voted for Equal Vote to take on responsibility the Forum officially and to join the Equal Vote Coalition as it's own entity some time ago and so we've been slowly checking off boxes to get that squared away on the back end, including paying for the hosting for it. Equal Vote only has 2 people on staff and we do a lot, so it's our volunteers and community who are doing the posting and discussion, not so much just our staff. (Currently Sass and I.)

Jack and the council haven't "given up control". This is the first time I'm hearing that there was a conduct issue with Jack. If so, and if it hasn't resolved itself by now, I invite everyone to take a look at the code of conduct and DM me if there is action required on that.

Rob's ideas for the forum (before and now) are good, but the way he came at the conversation back at the CES forum when we were first deciding what to do, and again now, are out of line. People voted on what to do. There was a bug in the tally on the new tool Jay was building at the time, the bug was caught, discussion was had on whether to revote or keep working towards a more broadly supported censuses since the race was very close and the winner wasn't broadly popular, people opted to call it done, and the results were accepted by all.

Bringing it up again in the context of a mutiny is ridiculous for a forum that all can agree could use more involvement from everyone, not less. I'd love to post and engage more, but have been busy with a move lately. In the meantime the forum is here as a resource for those who do have questions to post or ideas to share.

We are looking for more people to be involved in moderation and leadership roles. If that's something you're interested in please let me know. One issue is that after CES let their forum die, and after we stepped up to recreate it here, they launched their discord as the space for similar conversations. My understanding is that took away some of the demand for a new forum. Reddit also fills the niche somewhat. Still, I think this is a great resource, and it's here when we need it.

SaraWolk

PS: I have shown consistent effort and currently have put in more time set up, moderate, and host this forum than anyone else other than Jack.

I may not post a lot, and I'm not volunteering to be a main moderator because of bandwidth, but I just spent hours on the back end stuff this last week to keep it up and make sure the expenses are paid. To do that and then come here and find this thread feels super insulting and hurtful.

The forum is posted from the Equal Vote website under the Resources drop down.

Jack Waugh

I am sure we are all comrades here sharing certain common values and purposes, despite that some pairs of us have had disagreements at one time or another and still might not be in agreement on every point.

I am the one who injected the term "mutiny" for the proposal and no one else agreed that it is a good term and Rob specifically said it isn't. And he's right. It's more a proposal for self-governance in the face of the council having become inactive in fact. The only way ever suggested for the council to decide anything was by meeting, and since the question about simplifying the hierarchy of topic areas came up, and after multiple requests to meet by me, and a request to consider deciding things by e-mail, the members have not managed to come together on a meeting time, and there has been no response about any other way to make decisions. I think one member has not responded at all, if I remember correctly. The council only had four members. Anyway, given all the time that has gone by without a meeting and with a question open, it's fairly reasonable for anyone aware of the events to assess the body as factually inactive.

Jack and the council haven't "given up control".

In fact, I have given up, to you, Ms. Wolk, control of the domain-name registration. For good or ill, that's the plain fact. A few days ago, I could have changed the nameserver entries, and if I were to want to today, I could not, and you could.

Again, I re-emphasize our common interest here, which also you alluded to when you said this is a good resource, and I appreciate the contributions to date of Rob, Sara, and all others who have posted or have been involved in the mechanics or governance or sharing of thoughts on what the forum should be.

SaraWolk

@jack-waugh Good reminders, thanks. Still, calling a vote in a thread ad hoc to take control is a pretty extreme thing to do, especially considering the history. Calling a vote in a thread rather than helping to properly call a meeting and scheduling it is not how decision making for orgs is done.

Putting a meeting on the agenda sounds like a good idea. We also can have that meeting open to anyone interested in potentially helping with leadership in any capacity, as we always have in the past.

When I said "Jack and the council haven't "given up control"." I stand by that. The council put Equal Vote in 'control' quite a while ago, though Jack was still hosting the domain name on his personal account, which was always a temporary solution. Jack still admins the web hosting for now.

For that reason, I don't see putting the name under Equal Vote as a change of control, it's just a change of admin on the managing. 'Control' was and is still held by the Voting Theory Council, with Equal Vote managing it per the Forum Council's decisions. If there were ever issues with me or Jack or whoever is admining the domain stepping down or passing keys, that could be remedied now.

SaraWolk

@rob @Jack-Waugh, To all reading this, I'd like to clarify that the "vote" Rob is referencing above was to pick a name for this new forum. It wasn't a vote on who to unilaterally put in charge. There was full consensus on who to put in change with everyone wanting to convene a council to govern the Forum and make decisions according to bylaws and processes that we then spent months dialing in. Everyone who volunteered was on that council.

We completed that process steadily with a lot of meetings upfront and now that it's done, the plan was/is to convene council meetings as needed. While it would be great to have a meeting soon to bring in some new leadership if people are interested, or to talk about upgrades proposed, we've still been just plugging away at what was previously decided.

Rob retracted his initial offer to help and wasn't on that original council because of the way he handled the situation he references above; attacking others (me and Jay who had stepped up to try and help,) assuming bad faith, and generally making a simple decision into a hostile nightmare of drama that was very toxic, personal, and lasted for months.

The council considered inviting Rob to be on the council anyways after some time had passed because he clearly has a lot of positive things that he could contribute, but specifically decided not to because of the history. Jack shouldn't be passing keys to anyone the council hasn't authorized to hold them.

Rob, I would be happy to work with you, but the way you've treated me before and again now has been repeatedly hostile, personal, and uncalled for. I would have quit over it a few times, (as Jay did) but as the only woman in this space I'm too stubborn to do so. If you want to turn a new leaf and try to get involved here again this isn't the way to do it.

Ps. Thanks for tagging everyone but me in a thread about me. Nice.

Jack Waugh

When something is determined by a vote, how long before it can come up for reconsideration and possible change by another vote? I think the same question came up in regard to Brexit. Someone in the UK political context said the UK people should vote on it again. And someone responded, if it's reversed by that vote, do we need another vote to see whether we are reversing the decision again. And so on.

rob

@jack-waugh We have the ability to recall a governor here in California, and it's pretty much a mess. But at least it is agreed upon before the vote exactly what the process is.

If we were to do a vote again at the forum (*), it should be agreed ahead of time who is allowed to vote (say, people who have posted at least once in each of the last 3 months?), and, given that, we stick with the results unless a supermajority request a revote. (for instance, if over 60% vote yes on a binary choice of yes or no to a revote)

The problem we needed to account for when voting for the domain was, what if a bunch of people (possibly a bunch of troublemakers from Reddit or something) insincerely vote for "Boaty McBoatface" or the like? Do we have to stick with the results? That wasn't the case here, as there was no indication that anyone voted insincerely.

The other thing we should do is have the voting happen on the forum, not in some offsite thing, so it is crystal clear who voted for what, since you are voting with your logged-in account. It also means anyone can tabulate it, there is no one running the vote and doing the counting.... anyone can count it and if others don't trust their tabulation, they can just do their own count and show their work. There is no need for a voting widget or anything, since it isn't hard to produce a compact set of ballots manually as long as the number of voters is fairly low. People should probably be allowed to change their votes up until the deadline, but only once. If we choose a method that is difficult to game, it shouldn't be a problem that you can see other people's votes prior to casting your own.

* for anything consequential. If voting for "favorite voting method", it's no big deal if we disagree on which method really won, since there is no action item based on it, it's just a fun vote.

SaraWolk

@jack-waugh Voting Theory Bylaws

Sass

@rob,

As stated in your original post, "It’s not like there is much activity." So why, then, do you keep highlighting that "[Equal Vote hasn't] even visited the forum in ages." What do you count as Equal Vote?

Until 8 months ago, @SaraWolk was the only employee, and now I'm the second. But are we the only people who count as "Equal Vote"? I'd say no. @Andy-Dienes was recently the chair of our PR Research Committee. @Keith-Edmonds is a board member. @Marcus-Ogren is leading Equal Vote research. @Jameson-Quinn is doing the same. @masiarek helps with outreach and the Software Development Committee. I could go on, but I consider all of these fine folks to be a part of Equal Vote and when they post here, that counts as Equal Vote participation.

We promote the Forum in our slack regularly. It's linked on the Equal Vote site. And have you checked out similar forums recently? There hasn't been much text-based activity anywhere lately. r/EndFPTP is mostly news articles about RCV. The three voting theory channels in the CES discord are so dead that when I promote my Open Democracy Discussions in them every week, the most recent post is often my promotion from the previous week. The Forward Party discord server had some activity when it started up, but it's died down, too. The most in-depth text-based discussions about voting theory recently have been nonsense Twitter fights with people who think improving single winner elections in the US is completely pointless. There's just a general apathy in the theory space right now. I suspect it's temporary and will ramp back up when high-profile US election campaigns pick up steam, but for now, the issue isn't a lack of participation from Equal Vote.

Obviously, we all want the forum to be better. So why not offer that? There's no need to wrap it up in some weird package about you "running" it. As Sara stated, there are processes for all of this, agreed on by a council of active volunteers.

Though I wasn't around for the founding, I'm privy to the history. I'm included in the email threads. I wouldn't have moved 2,300 miles across the country if I didn't care enough to learn it all. Moreover, I care enough that I've cultivated a space where the in-depth voting theory discussions ARE happening: my Open Democracy Discussions. They're not text-based, but they've attracted some of the folks here like @stardrop, @last19digitsofpi, @Jack-Waugh, @robla, and even yourself once or twice. I think part of why people go there is because it's a space that is explicitly non-toxic. Sara has been talking about this for years and she's right. It's why she's been elected as the Executive Director of Equal Vote multiple times. Cooler heads have prevailed and realized that Sara is what this movement needs, and activists have responded positively to that.

I'll point out that I don't think Sara should be the dictator of the Forum or whatever. I work next to her every day. I promise you that she doesn't want to be. Sara's trying to cultivate a positive culture and I implore you take that to heart.

Fueling rage against Equal Vote only makes this forum worse. If you want to make this forum better, then start by making it better.

Keith Edmonds

I agree with @Sass and @SaraWolk on this. So I will not reiterate their comments.

I think this forum is needed. When the CES shut down their forum I was one of the people who pushed for this to be created. I also pushed for it to not be run by Equal Vote. I wanted it to be more like electowiki.org. Independent of any of the think tanks or lobby groups. I want EqualVote to push people to discuss on the forum but I do not want it to be though of as EqualVote's forum. I think it is moving in that direction and that makes me happy.

I think we just need it to grow. I am happy to let Rob take over the leadership of the forum. However, I do have one condition. He has to stop bashing EqualVote. Again I would point to EqualVotes relationship with electowiki.org. The Rob (@robla) who runs that has a great relationship with EqualVote and there is a large overlap between the contributors to both organizations. Having a Rob (@rob ) running this would be great. EqualVote is a coalition of organizations and people with a shared goal. A forum is a needed part of this coalition. I do not like Reddit so I don't post there almost ever. I would rather people come to this forum.